Selection

Thermal or coated: pick the face stock by printer, not by habit

Two stocks look the same on the roll and behave nothing alike on the line. The deciding question is not price per square metre — it is what prints the label.

1 November 20265 min

Start from the print head, not the spec sheet

Thermal paper carries a coating that darkens where the print head heats it. No ribbon, no ink, one consumable. Coated paper carries nothing that reacts; it needs a thermal transfer ribbon to take an image. If your printer has no ribbon spindle, the question is already answered.

Where thermal wins

Variable-data work at volume: waybills, carton labels, shelf-edge price tickets, pick-and-pack. The cost per label is the lowest of any system because there is no ribbon, and 203 or 300 dpi output is enough for a barcode. Our thermal stock runs on direct thermal printers from 25 mm to 1,070 mm web width.

Where thermal fails

Heat, sunlight, plasticiser and long storage. A thermal image fades; a coated print does not. Labels that live on a window, a dashboard, a chemical drum or a five-year asset record should not be thermal, however cheap the first roll looks.

Where coated wins

Anything that has to survive handling or be looked at: retail packaging, cosmetic bottles, industrial nameplates, anything with a logo and more than one colour. Coated takes offset, flexo and UV inkjet, holds fine type at 8 pt, and resists abrasion once laminated or varnished.

The cost comparison nobody does properly

Compare total cost per applied label, not per roll. Thermal removes the ribbon but caps you at one colour and a limited life. Coated adds a ribbon and a plate but gives you colour, durability and a printable reverse. For a 10,000-label run the ribbon is usually a smaller line item than the reprint caused by a faded thermal label.

READ NEXT
Same material questions
Materials
Blue liner, white liner: what the colour actually tells you
Adhesive
Why labels lift in the freezer, and the three things to change
← All articles